For Christmas I got an interesting present from a pal - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a few simple triggers about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of composing, however it's also a bit repeated, and very verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's prompts in collecting information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repeated hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, because rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can order any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in anybody's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, trademarketclassifieds.com developed by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is meant as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered even more.

He wants to widen his variety, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - selling AI-generated items to human clients.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and disgaeawiki.info stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we really suggest human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for creative functions must be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without authorization should be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely effective but let's develop it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: vetlek.ru The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to utilize creators' material on the internet to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of happiness," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its finest carrying out industries on the vague pledge of development."

A government spokesperson stated: "No move will be made until we are definitely confident we have a useful strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to assist them accredit their content, access to high-quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, kenpoguy.com a nationwide data library containing public data from a large variety of sources will also be made available to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the safety of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector required to share details of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a number of claims against AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their permission, systemcheck-wiki.de and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of factors which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training information and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a portion of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to check out in parts because it's so verbose.

But offered how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure how long I can remain confident that my considerably slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.