Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities' All-important Role
franceshargrav edited this page 3 weeks ago


The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful sports betting.

No, they weren't personally in presence, but the world-famous celebrities were notably included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes casinos - the questionable websites using both totally free casino-style video games and profitable prizes, such as money, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now finds itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of many gaming corporations, not to discuss claim complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos serve as standard casinos, just without the oversight, consumer defenses and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal gaming levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulative obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in revenue last year alone. Now the business faces allegations of illegal sports betting in a New York claim that claims VGW utilizes star endorsers to 'create a veneer of authenticity' around its product. (See VGW's declaration listed below)

'I'm uncertain" if you don't trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business operating multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a series of stars from gambling enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any distinctions in between traditional gambling and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen Wow Vegas, among numerous sweepstakes gambling establishments found online

Ryan Seacrest advises fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where lots of - but not all - games are complimentary

Drake has a deal with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he regularly promotes on social networks

Learn more
bet9ja.com
Donald Trump 'set to call NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'
bit.ly
Instead, advertisements usually focus around the social aspect of the casinos, while leaving out the potential for real gambling losses.

Others tempt consumers with promises of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media advertisement flaunting Drake's vehicles, planes and mansions before pivoting to video footage of the rap artist playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot cash?' read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: 'Because I never quit.'

The discrepancy between sports betting sites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complicated, however operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the former.

A representative for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competitors with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, the majority of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are sports betting complimentary.

'Most social sweeps consumers never ever buy,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller sized than the common deposit or wager size at real-money online gambling websites.'

Social casinos provide consumers a possibility to play casino-style video games with pals. Players have the alternative to buy valueless currency typically referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for real money, but can be utilized to unlock various features within the video games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, enabling customers to acquire other currency called 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other prizes.

And therein lies the potential for financial losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the past year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker occasion

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an ad revealing off Drake's cars and trucks, aircrafts and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are banned in all but seven states, which has actually helped to sustain the popularity of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which do not need normally require identification. However, sites like Chumba will request for IDs from players trying to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable consumers to send mail-in demands for free sweeps coins, offered the players follow painfully particular directions. What's more, players are typically rewarded with sweeps coins merely for signing up, thus providing a factor to try their hands at any variety of casino video games for a chance to win - or lose - genuine money.

So why are sweepstakes sites allowed to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competition is just a method of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes games are merely a form of online entertainment,' an SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is needed to dip into social gambling establishments with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never need to spend for a chance to win prizes. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is a crucial difference between social sweeps and standard online gambling websites like casinos.'

Consider the manner in which McDonald's uses its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, but rather they're purchasing hamburgers and fries that offer them the opportunity to win financially rewarding prizes, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the video game itself doesn't fulfill the meaning of gaming in the US.
bet9ja.com
'Sweepstakes are an enduring method for promoting all kinds of everyday businesses in the United States, everything from burgers to magazine memberships to coffee and home enhancement stores,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are routinely utilized by a who's who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to lots of gambling industry insiders, that argument doesn't cut it.

For beginners, video gaming attorney Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald's Monopoly video game does not run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, thereby recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real products like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last permanently and they're generally not tied to casino-style games of possibility,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're just cash free gifts.
bet9ja.com
'The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the characteristics commonly associated with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes casinos offer" casino-like" payments, generally 80 percent or more of incomes, whereas the normal payment portion for a temporary promotional sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the revenue made by the company [usually less than one percent]'

Wallach is fast to liken the online social sweeps casinos to the web coffee shops that emerged in Florida, providing clients the chance to play casino-style games for genuine rewards. A lot of those brick-and-mortar facilities have given that been shuttered over accusations of illegal gambling.

DJ Khaled is among numerous celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments must deal with similar examination.

'These distinctions are not arbitrary,' Wallach said of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have repeatedly been mentioned by courts and state chief law officer as crucial consider figuring out that a sweepstakes promo was in truth a guise for prohibited gambling.'

One of the casino industry's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing legislators to investigate sweepstakes operators and, sometimes, enact new legislation on the issue.

'Consumers are being denied of securities and states are giving up substantial tax and revenue opportunities as this gaming replaces that carried out through regulated channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the plaintiffs who have sued social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without confessing any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action claim, saying the settlement was made to avoid legal costs and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has actually signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the current claim, which is largely comparable to its predecessors, New york city state citizens Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'unlawful gaming business. '

Apple and Google have actually also been named as defendants in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company responded to DailyMail.com's demand for remark.

'We usually don't talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson told DailyMail.com through email. 'However, we note that this claim has only just been submitted with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

'We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we operate, and stay confident about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to use our free-to-play games throughout many of North America, as we have for more than a decade, creating not only great video games, user experiences and entertainment, but also ensuring this is done safely, responsibly and at the greatest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd repeat that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are fairly typical throughout the online social video games market (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we intend to strongly defend any claim which may be brought against us.'

The issues in between standard online sports betting and sweepstakes casinos could prove troublesome for some star endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with standard video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that expert athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting 'sweeps' websites while at the exact same time the leagues wish to project a strong position versus prohibited gaming - specifically when attempting to tamp down the occasional sports betting scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was simply 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime ban from the NBA over claims he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting apparently illegal gambling websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a significant issue for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on professional athletes endorsing sweepstakes sites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the players' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's demands for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also ignored to respond to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their star endorsers have a responsibility to describe to customers the differences and resemblances between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have full self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our service practices more broadly,' the spokesperson said. 'A few of our values are" our gamers precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.
bet9ja.com
'Celebrities who provide their names to dubious illegal gaming sites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at threat along with courting civil and class actions by customers who allege harm,' Glaser said. 'There is likewise some threat that state regulators and state attorney generals of the United States rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for facilitating illegal gambling.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton